SCDSS v. David S.

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Shawna O.,
David S., and Sebastian S., Defendants,

of whom David S.
is the Appellant.

In the
interests of five minor children under the age of 18.

Appeal From Aiken County

Peter R. Nuessle, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-163

Submitted March 2, 2009 – Filed April 6,
2009

AFFIRMED

Charles C. Mayers, of Augusta, for Appellant.

Amanda F. Whittle, of Aiken, for Respondent.

Patrick A. McWilliams, of Aiken, for Guardian Ad Litem.

PER CURIAM:.
David S. appeals from the family court’s order
issued September 15, 2008, following a removal merits hearing.  After a thorough review of the record and
the family court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Ex
Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987) and S.C. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. v. Frederick Downer, Sr.,
S.C. Sup. Ct. Order dated February 2, 2005 (expanding the procedure set forth
in Cauthen to situations where an indigent person appeals from an order
imposing other measures short of termination of parental rights), we find no meritorious issues warrant
briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family court’s ruling and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

AFFIRMED.[1]

HEARN, C.J., GEATHERS, J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.