SCDSS v. Sheila G.

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Sheila G.,
Leroy G., Gregory B. and John D.,  Defendants,

of whom Sheila
G. is the Appellant.

In the interest of five children under the age of 18.

Appeal From Darlington County

 Jamie Lee Murdock, Jr., Family Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-164

Submitted March 2, 2009 – Filed April 6,
2009  

Affirmed

David Craig Brown, of Florence, for Appellant.

Elizabeth Biggerstaff York, of Hartsville, for Respondent.

Robbie Forrester Gardner, III, of Hartsville, for Guardian Ad
Litem.

PER
CURIAM:  Sheila G. appeals the
termination of her parental rights to five children under the age of 18.  See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570
(Supp. 2008).  Upon a thorough review of
the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law,
pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we
find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family
court's ruling and relieve counsel. 

AFFIRMED.[1]

HEARN, C.J.,
GEATHERS, J., and GOOLSBY, A.J. concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.