State v. Eigner

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Keith Eigner, Appellant.

 

Appeal From Union County

Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-181

Submitted April 1, 2009 – Filed April 30,
2009 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender, Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Keith
Eigner appeals his convictions for possession with intent to distribute (PWID)
crack cocaine, PWID cocaine, and possession of marijuana, and concurrent
sentences of twenty years, twenty years, and one year, respectively.  Eigner's
counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
arguing the trial court erred in refusing to suppress evidence obtained via
execution of a search warrant based on false information.  Eigner also filed a
pro se brief reasserting his counsel's briefed argument as well as numerous
other arguments.  After a thorough
review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

SHORT,
THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.