State v. Thurmond

CourtListener 10155580ScctappMar 10, 2009

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Teri Lee
Thurmond, Appellant.

Appeal from Charleston County

R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-137

Submitted March 2, 2009 – Filed March 10,
2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Teri
Lee Thurmond appeals her probation revocation, arguing the trial court revoked
her probation arbitrarily and capriciously.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.