In The Interest Of Breanna Nicole H.

CourtListener 10155569ScctappMar 30, 2009

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

In The Interest
Of Breanna Nicole H., A Minor Under The Age Of Seventeen, Appellant.

Appeal From Oconee County

 R. Wright Turbeville, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-153

Submitted March 2, 2009 – Filed March 30,
2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Christina Theos Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Breanna H. appeals the family court’s
order requiring her to pay $2,119.42 in restitution.  After a thorough review of the record, counsel’s
brief, and Breanna’s pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1] 

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
PIEPER and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.