State v. McCall

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Eunice Davis McCall, Appellant.

Appeal From Lee County

Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-077

Submitted February 2, 2009 – Filed
February 11, 2009 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor C. Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Eunice Davis McCall appeals convictions for voluntary
manslaughter and possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent
crime, and concurrent sentences of eighteen and five years.  McCall argues the
trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury on the law of accident.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss McCall's
appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

SHORT,
THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.