State v. Pettis

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Carwin Tyrone
Pettis, Jr., Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-657

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed
December 4, 2008  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin,  of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Carwin Tyrone Pettis, Jr. appeals his probation
revocation and sentence of one year and continued probation.  Pettis argues the
trial court abused its discretion in revoking his suspended sentence.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Pettis’s
appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

HEARN,
C.J., SHORT and KONDUROS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.