State v. Wright

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Hollie Wright, Jr., Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-667

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed
December 8, 2008   

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,
Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Michelle J. Parsons,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Hollie Wright, Jr., appeals his conviction
and sentence for criminal domestic violence of a high and aggravated nature
arguing the trial court erred in refusing to grant a mistrial.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Tucker,
324 S.C. 155, 169, 478 S.E.2d 260, 267 (1996) (finding an issue waived for
appellate review when a trial court’s offer of a curative instruction is
refused); State v. Watts, 321 S.C. 158, 164, 467 S.E.2d 272, 276 (Ct.
App. 1996) (finding a rejection of the trial court’s offer to give a curative
instruction waives any complaint to the challenged testimony).

AFFIRMED.

HEARN, C.J., SHORT and KONDUROS,JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.