State v. Bailey

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Manix A.
Bailey, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

Judge Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-672

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed
December 9, 2008 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott
Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Manix A. Bailey appeals his guilty pleas for possession with intent to distribute cocaine,
trafficking crack cocaine more than ten grams, and two counts of distribution
of crack cocaine and four concurrent sentences
of twelve years.  He maintains his guilty plea failed to conform with
the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1] 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, HUFF,
and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.