State v. Ford

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE, IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Bianca Lanor
Ford, Appellant.

Appeal From Georgetown County

 John M. Milling, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-678

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed
December 9, 2008   

AFFIRMED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
and Senior Assistant Attorney General Norman Mark Rapoport, all of Columbia;
and Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Bianca
Lanor Ford appeals her convictions of possession with intent to distribute
marijuana and possession with intent to distribute cocaine.  Ford argues the
trial court erred by admitting evidence obtained during the search of her
vehicle, maintaining the search violated her Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment
rights.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority:  State v.
Forrester, 343 S.C. 637, 642, 541 S.E.2d 837, 840 (2001) (holding in order
to preserve an issue for review, a party must renew its objection upon the
introduction of the evidence ruled admissible in a motion in limine when the admission of evidence does not immediately follow the ruling).

AFFIRMED.

ANDERSON,
HUFF, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.