State v. Jones

CourtListener 10155422ScctappDec 10, 2008

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,  Respondent,

v.

Michael Jones, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

D. Garrison Hill, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-683

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed
December 10, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Michael Jones appeals his convictions of possession
with intent to distribute crack cocaine and possession with intent to
distribute crack cocaine within a half mile of a school or church.  Jones
argues the trial court erred by failing to admonish the solicitor for allowing
a witness to comment on Jones’ post-arrest silence.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Jones’ appeal
and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

ANDERSON,
HUFF, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.