State v. Reinhold

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Russell
Reinhold, Appellant.

Appeal From Georgetown County

 Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-689

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed
December 11, 2008 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Russell
Reinhold appeals his
convictions and sentences for filing a
false police report and malicious injury to personal property.  On appeal, he
argues the trial court erred in admitting certain items into evidence.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.