City of Rock Hill v. Garga-Richardson

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE, IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

City of Rock Hill, Respondent,

v.

Alieo Garga-Richardson, Appellant.

Appeal from York County

 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-612

Submitted November 3, 2008 – Filed
November 10, 2008   

AFFIRMED

Alieo C. Garga-Richardson, pro se, for Appellant.

Christopher Edward Barton, of Rock Hill, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Alieo C. Garga-Richardson appeals the circuit court’s dismissal of
his appeal from the municipal court.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and
the following authorities: S.C. Code Ann. § 14-25-95 (Supp. 2007) (requiring an appellant to set forth the grounds for appeal in his
notice of appeal from the municipal court); S.C.
Code Ann. § 14-25-105 (Supp. 2007) (providing the circuit
court does not conduct a de novo review in criminal appeals
from municipal court); City of Rock Hill v. Suchenski, 374
S.C. 12, 15, 646 S.E.2d 879, 880 (2007) (holding in criminal appeals from
the municipal court, the appellate court reviews errors of law only). 

AFFIRMED.

HEARN, C.J., SHORT and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.