State v. Frasier

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

David Frasier, Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County

 G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-558

Submitted October 1, 2008 – Filed October
9, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  A
jury found David Frasier guilty of assault and battery of a high and aggravated
nature (ABHAN), committing a lewd act on a minor, and disseminating harmful
materials to a minor.  Frasier argues the
trial judge erred in allowing the State to introduce evidence that was
irrelevant and unduly prejudicial.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Frasier’s appeal and grant
counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1] 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT and THOMAS, JJ., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.