State v. Niles

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Robdrecko A.
Niles, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

 G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge

 D. Garrison Hill, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-546

Submitted October 1, 2008 – Filed October
9, 2008

AFFIRMED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant
Attorney General Deborah R. J. Shupe, all of Columbia; Solicitor Robert M.
Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Robdrecko Niles appeals
his convictions for trafficking in cocaine and driving under suspension,
arguing the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress.  We
affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities:  Terry v.
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 30 (1968) (finding police may briefly detain and question
a person upon a reasonable suspicion criminal activity is involved); State v.
Foster, 269 S.C. 373, 379, 237 S.E.2d 589, 592 (1977) (finding there was no
search or seizure of defendant when he pulled his car over without any
prompting by law enforcement); State v. Odom, 376 S.C. 330, 334, 656
S.E.2d 748, 750 (Ct. App. 2007) (explaining the appellate court’s review
in Fourth Amendment search and seizure cases is limited to determining whether
any evidence supports the trial court’s finding).

AFFIRMED.

Anderson, Williams, and Konduros,
JJ., concur

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.