State v. James

CourtListener 10155302ScctappOct 15, 2008

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,  Respondent,

v.

David Shawn
James, Appellant

Appeal From York County

John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-582

Submitted October 1, 2008 – Filed October
15, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Attorney Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel
Tommy Evans, Jr., and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  David Shawn James was on probation for breaking into a
motor vehicle.  While on probation, James was arrested, and his probation was
revoked.  James argues the trial court arbitrarily and capriciously revoked his
probation.    After a thorough
review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss James’ appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

SHORT, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.