State v. King

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Eugene King, Appellant.

Appeal From Orangeburg County

 James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-538

Submitted September 2, 2008 – Filed
September 17, 2008  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor David M. Pascoe, Jr., of Summerville; for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Eugene
King appeals his conviction and sentence for murder, arguing the trial court
erred by admitting his confession in violation of Jackson v. Denno, 378
U.S. 368 (1964).  King also asserts numerous pro se arguments.  After a thorough review of the record, counsel’s
brief, and King’s pro se brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] King’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT,
THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.