State v. Mack

CourtListener 10155192ScctappAug 15, 2008

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Terriel Lashawn
Mack, Appellant.

Appeal From Florence County

Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-486

Submitted August 1, 2008 – Filed August
15, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar L. Clements, III, of Florence, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Terriel Lashawn Mack was convicted of murder and
sentenced to life imprisonment.  Mack appeals his conviction, arguing the
circuit court erred in admitting testimony that he carried a gun after he was
released from prison.  Mack’s counsel attached to the final brief a petition to
be relieved as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), stating he had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacked
merit.  After a thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Mack’s pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Mack’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved. 

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, J., CURETON,
and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.