State v. Bowman

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Keyon Baxter
Bowman, Appellant.

Appeal From Orangeburg County

Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-366

Submitted July 1, 2008 – Filed July 11,
2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals Robert M. Dudek, South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor David M. Pascoe, Jr., of Summerville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Keyon Baxter Bowman appeals his
conviction and sentence for assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature
and armed robbery and his sentence under an Alford[1] plea for voluntary manslaughter.  On appeal, Bowman argues his guilty plea
failed to comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395
U.S. 238 (1969), because the circuit court erred in apprising him of his rights
in a colloquy that lasted less than two pages of the record.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[2] Bowman’s appeal. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.

[1] North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970).

[2] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.