State v. Wade

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

State, Respondent,

v.

Ryan O’Neal
Wade, Appellant.

Appeal From Lancaster County

Brooks P. Goldsmith, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-392

Submitted July 1, 2008 – Filed July 15,
2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,  all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of Lancaster, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Ryan O’Neal Wade appeals his guilty plea to
shoplifting, third or more offense and probation revocation.  He was sentenced
to concurrent sentences of six years for the shoplifting charge and his
probation was revoked not to exceed five years.  Wade argues his guilty plea
was involuntary because it did not comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin
v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Wade’s appeal
and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.