State v. Brannon

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Ricky Brannon, Appellant.

Appeal From Cherokee County

 Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-313

Submitted June 1, 2008 – Filed June 20,
2008

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, South Carolina Commission on
Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
and Assistant Attorney General Deborah R. J. Shupe , all of Columbia; and
Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Ricky
Brannon appeals his convictions for burglary in the first degree and grand
larceny, arguing the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of a
footprint analysis expert.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v.
Schumpert, 312 S.C. 502, 507, 435 S.E.2d 859, 862 (1993) (“Unless an objection is made at the time the evidence is
offered and a final ruling made, the issue is not preserved for review.”); State v. Wood, 362 S.C. 520, 526, 608 S.E.2d 435, 438 (Ct. App. 2004) (holding
a party opposing the admission of evidence must object to the evidence when it
is introduced because “a motion in limine is not a final
determination”), cert. denied (Aug. 15, 2006); State v. Burton,
326 S.C. 605, 611, 486 S.E.2d 762, 765 (Ct. App. 1997) (“Unless an objection is
made at the time the evidence is offered and a final ruling made, the issue is
not preserved for review.”).

AFFIRMED.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.