CourtListener 10155003•State v. David M.
Full text
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
State of South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent,
v.
Rebecca M.,
David M., Defendants, Of Whom David M. is the Appellant.
In the interests
of: Female Child DOB: 7/21/95; Female Child DOB: 5/11/96; both minors under
the age of 18.
Appeal From Florence County
William J. Wylie, Jr., Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-321
Submitted June 26, 2008 Filed June 27,
2008
AFFIRMED
David B. Betts, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Newton I. Howle, Jr., of Darlington, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: David
M. appeals a family court order issued
subsequent to an intervention hearing. After
a thorough review of the record pursuant
to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987) and S.C. Dept
of Soc. Servs. v. Frederick Downer, Sr., S.C.Sup.Ct. Order dated February
2, 2005 (expanding the procedure set forth in Cauthen to situations
where an indigent person appeals from an order imposing other measures short of
termination of parental rights), we
affirm the family courts ruling.
AFFIRMED.[1]
HEARN,
C.J., THOMAS, J., and CURETON, A.J.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.