SCDSS v. Rodriquez M.

CourtListener 10154987ScctappMay 14, 2008

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Christy P.,
Rodriquez M., and John Doe, Defendants,

Of Whom
Rodriquez M. is the Appellant.

In the interest
of:  P.M. (DOB: 06/10/05) Minor child under the age of 18.

Appeal From Horry County

 H. E. Bonnoitt, Jr., Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-253

Submitted May 1, 2008 – Filed May 14, 2008   

AFFIRMED

Ronald R. Norton, of Conway, for Appellant.

Ernest J. Jarrett, of Kingstree, for Respondent.

James Craig Murray, of Myrtle Beach, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: This appeal arises from the termination of parental
rights of Rodriquez M.  After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Ex
Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we affirm[1] the family court’s ruling and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

AFFIRMED.

HEARN,
C.J., and SHORT and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.