CourtListener 10154978•Folks v. State
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Leon Folks, Petitioner
v.
State of South Carolina, Respondent
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Appeal From Aiken County
James C. Williams, Jr., Trial Judge
Doyet A. Early, III, Post-Conviction
Relief Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-266
Submitted April 1, 2008 Filed May 16,
2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Attorney Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia; and Leon Folks, of Bennettsville; for Petitioner.
Assistant Attorney General Ashley McMahan, of Columbia; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Petitioner
seeks a writ of certiorari from the denial of his application for
post-conviction relief (PCR). The State concedes to the PCR judges finding
that petitioner did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to a direct
appeal. Accordingly, we grant the petition for a writ of certiorari and
proceed with a review of the direct appeal issue pursuant to Davis v. State,
288 S.C. 290, 342 S.E.2d 60 (1986).
Petitioners appeal is dismissed,[1] after consideration of counsels brief and review pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsels motion to be relieved is
granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Huff, Kittredge and Williams,
JJ., concur.
[1] We decided this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.