Holland v. Holland

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Renee McDuffie
Holland, Respondent,

v.

Wells McManus
Holland, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

 Henry T. Woods, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-277

Submitted May 1, 2008 – Filed May 27, 2008

AFFIRMED

Wells McManus Holland, of Wagener, pro se.

Charles D. Lee, III, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Wells Holland appeals the family court’s grant of a
divorce to Renee Holland on the grounds of one year separation, sole custody of
their children, and periodic alimony and child support of $750.00 and $675.00 a
month, respectively.  We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(2), SCACR, and the
following authorities:  11 U.S.C.A. §1301 (2004) (stating a creditor may not
act or commence any civil action to collect debt of the debtor, unless the case
is dismissed); Nelson vs. QHG of S.C., Inc., 362 S.C. 421, 608 S.E.2d
855 (2005) (finding the remedy for inadequate representation is a malpractice
action against the former attorney); and Floyd v. Floyd, 365 S.C. 56,
615 S.E.2d 465 (Ct. App. 2005) (holding an issue cannot be raised for the first
time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court
in order to be preserved for appellate review).

Accordingly,
the family court’s order is

AFFIRMED.[1]

HEARN, C.J., and SHORT, J., and KONDUROS, J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.