State v. Cokley

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Gensing George
Cokley, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-203

Submitted March 3, 2008 – Filed March 24,
2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III , South Carolina Commission
of Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Gensing George Cokley appeals his convictions and sentences for murder,
attempted armed robbery, possession of a firearm during the commission of a
violent crime, and conspiracy.  Cokley’s counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved
as counsel, stating that he had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal
lacks merit.  Cokley filed a separate pro se brief.  After a
thorough review of the record, counsel’s
brief, and Cokley’s pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HUFF,
KITTREDGE, and WILLIAMS JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.