State v. Bradwell

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Mark D.
Bradwell, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

 Reginald I. Lloyd, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-086

Submitted February 1, 2008 – Filed 
February 8, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Mark
Bradwell appeals his convictions and
sentences for second-degree burglary, attempted rape, and assault and battery of
a high and aggravated nature.  On appeal, Bradwell argues his guilty plea
failed to comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395
U.S. 238 (1969) because the trial court accepted his guilty plea for attempted
rape then sentenced him for first-degree assault with intent to commit criminal
sexual conduct.  Bradwell also asserts numerous pro se arguments.  After a thorough review of the record,
counsel’s brief, and Bradwell’s pro se brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Bradwell’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, SHORT and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.