State v. Collins

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Robbie Collins, Appellant.

Appeal From Lee County

 Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-098

Submitted February 1, 2008 – Filed
February 11, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, South Carolina Commission of
Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Cecil Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Robbie Collins appeals his convictions and sentences
for murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent
crime.  On appeal, Collins maintains the trial court abused its discretion by
admitting several letters he allegedly wrote to co-defendant, Jumal Prescott,
because the letters were not properly authenticated.  Collins also asserts
numerous pro se arguments.  After
a thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Collins’s pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Collins’s appeal and grant counsel’s
motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., PIEPER, J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.