State v. Wise

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Stanley Wise Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

James E. Lockemy, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-001

Submitted January 2, 2008 – Filed January 2, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief
Attorney Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J.
Zelenka, of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for
Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Stanley Wise appeals his convictions for murder, two
counts of assault and battery with intent to kill (ABWIK), and three counts of
possession of a firearm while in the commission of a violent crime, as well as
his sentences of life imprisonment for murder, ten years for each ABWIK charge,
and five years for each possession of a firearm charge, all to run
concurrently.  Wise contends the trial court erred by admitting certain
evidence because its presence in the jury room during deliberations unduly
emphasized the evidence.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Wise’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, SHORT and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.