State v. Palmer

CourtListener 10154844ScctappJan 9, 2008

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

George Palmer, Appellant.

Appeal From Georgetown County

 Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-014

Submitted January 1, 2008 – Filed January
9, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellant Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary,  of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: George
Palmer appeals his conviction for breach of trust with fraudulent intent of an
amount greater than $5000 and sentence of ten years imprisonment, suspended
upon the service of seven years and three years probation.  Palmer contends the
trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for a directed verdict.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Palmer’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

ANDERSON,
SHORT and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.