State v. Richardson

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In the Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Robert Richardson, Jr., Appellant.

Appeal from York County

Lee S. Alford,
Circuit Court Judge

L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-015

Submitted January 1, 2008 – Filed January 9, 2008  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate
Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Thomas E. Pope, of York, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Robert Richardson, Jr., appeals his conviction of
financial transaction card theft and sentence of five years imprisonment.  He
maintains the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406
S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Richardson’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, SHORT and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.