State v. Gilliard

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Matthew William
Gilliard, III, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

 John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-044

Submitted January 2, 2008 – Filed January
14, 2008  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Teresa
A. Knox, Tommy Evans, Jr., and J. Benjamin Aplin, , all of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Matthew W. Gilliard, III, appeals the revocation of
his probation, arguing the probation judge erred in revoking his probation
because he did not willfully fail to pay his supervision fees.  Gilliard did
not file a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we
dismiss Gilliard’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN,
C.J., KITTREDGE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.