State v. Nix

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Roger Nix, Appellant.

Appeal From Anderson County

J.C. “Buddy” Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-052

Submitted January 1, 2008 – Filed January 14, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy
Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and

Solicitor Christina T. Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Roger Nix appeals his guilty pleas to burglary in the
second degree and petit larceny, arguing the plea court failed to comply with
the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969), in accepting
his plea.  Nix did not file a pro se brief.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss Nix’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
KITTREDGE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.