State v. Norris

CourtListener 10154625ScctappApr 18, 2012

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Carnie Norris
III, Appellant.

Appeal from Spartanburg County

J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-226

Submitted April 2, 2012 – Filed April 18,
2012   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, and Carnie Norris III, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barry J. Barnette, of
Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Carnie Norris III appeals his conviction of armed robbery, arguing the trial court erred in failing to instruct
the jury on sections  17-13-10 to -20 of the South Carolina Code (2003), dealing
with the right of citizens to make arrests.  Additionally, Norris asserts
several pro se arguments.  After a thorough
review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PIEPER,
KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.