SCDSS v. Melissa H.

CourtListener 10154596ScctappMar 7, 2012

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Melissa H. and
Chad Allen B., Defendants,

Of whom Melissa
H. is the Appellant.

In the interest
of a minor child under the age of 18.

Appeal from Greenville County

W. Marsh Robertson, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-163

Submitted March 1, 2012 – Filed March 7,
2012   

AFFIRMED

John Newkirk, of Taylors, for Appellant.

Deborah Murdock, of Mauldin, for Respondent.

Robert Clark, of Greenville, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Melissa H. appeals the family court's order terminating her parental rights.  Upon a thorough review of the record and
the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Ex
Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious
issues warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

AFFIRMED.[1]

FEW, C.J.,
HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.  

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.