State v. Lyles

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Noel Michael
Lyles, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-190 

Submitted March 1, 2012 – Filed March 14,
2012

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H.
Carter, of Columbia; and Noel Michael Lyles, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barry J. Barnette, of Spartanburg,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Noel Michael
Lyles appeals his convictions for armed robbery, assault and battery of a high
and aggravated nature, and grand larceny, arguing the trial court erred in admitting an eyewitness's
identification of him as the perpetrator.  Additionally, Lyles filed a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and briefs pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's
motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and
GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.