State v. Colleton

CourtListener 10154539ScctappMar 28, 2012

Full text

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Lennon Colleton, Appellant.

Appeal From Colleton County

Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-213

Submitted March 1, 2012 – Filed March 28,
2012  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia; and Lennon Colleton, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Isaac McDuffie Stone, III, of
Beaufort, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Lennon
Colleton appeals his convictions for two counts of assault with intent to kill,
arguing the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict on the charges because Colleton's act of
discharging a firearm into a dwelling could not be used to show he intended to
kill people in the dwelling.  Additionally, Colleton filed a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and briefs
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

WILLIAMS,
THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.