CourtListener 10154539•State v. Colleton
Full text
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Lennon Colleton, Appellant.
Appeal From Colleton County
Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-213
Submitted March 1, 2012 Filed March 28,
2012
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia; and Lennon Colleton, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Isaac McDuffie Stone, III, of
Beaufort, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Lennon
Colleton appeals his convictions for two counts of assault with intent to kill,
arguing the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict on the charges because Colleton's act of
discharging a firearm into a dwelling could not be used to show he intended to
kill people in the dwelling. Additionally, Colleton filed a pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and briefs
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS,
THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.