State v. Sanders

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Randall Q. Sanders, Appellant.

Appeal From Sumter County

R. Ferrell Cothran, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-082

Submitted February 1, 2012 – Filed
February 22, 2012 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia; and Randall Q. Sanders, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Ernest A. Finney, III, of Sumter,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Randall Q. Sanders appeals his conviction for possession
with the intent to distribute cocaine.  In his Anders brief, Sanders
argues the trial court erred in charging the jury on reasonable doubt because
the charge was so confusing that it violated his right of due process.  Additionally,
Sanders filed a pro se brief.  After a thorough
review of the record and briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

FEW, C.J., HUFF and SHORT,
JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.