SCDSS v. Amy E.R.

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Amy E. R.,
Gilbert R., and Angus C., Defendants,

Of whom Amy E.
R. is the, Appellant.

In the
interest of three minor children under the age of 18.

Appeal From Greenville County

Robert N. Jenkins, Sr., Family Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-053

Submitted January 3, 2012 – Filed January
26, 2012

AFFIRMED

Jonathan Ashley Neal and Thomas J. Quinn,
of Greenville, for Appellant.

Deborah  Murdock, of Mauldin, for
Respondent.

Robert A. Clark, of Greenville, for
Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Amy E. R. appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights
to her minor children.  See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010).  Upon a thorough review of
the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law
pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we
find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family
court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.[1]

FEW, C.J.,
THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.