State v. Sullivan

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jaques Jamar
Sullivan, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

 Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-446

Submitted October 1, 2011 – Filed October
11, 2011   

AFFIRMED

J. Falkner Wilkes, of Greenville, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Christina Catoe, all of Columbia; and Solicitor
W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Jaques
Jamar Sullivan appeals his conviction for trafficking cocaine, possession of a
weapon during the commission of a violent crime, and simple possession of
marijuana, arguing the trial court erred in admitting evidence obtained by a
defective search warrant.  We
affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority:  State v. Dunbar,
356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693-94 (2003) (stating an issue is preserved
for appellate review when it was raised to and ruled upon by the trial court
and when the ground presented to the trial court was the same as the ground
argued on appeal).

AFFIRMED.

HUFF,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.