SCDSS v. Martha H.

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department
of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Martha H.,
Jimmy J., and John Doe (whose true name is unknown),   Defendants,

Of whom Jimmy J.
is the Appellant.

In the interest of two minor children.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

Phillip K. Sinclair, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-405  

Submitted July 1, 2011 – Filed August 25,
2011

AFFIRMED

J. Christopher Bonds, of Spartanburg, for
Appellant.

Deborah  Murdock, of Mauldin, for
Respondent.

Michael Todd Thigpen, for Guardian ad
Litem.

PER CURIAM: Jimmy J. appeals the family court's final
order terminating parental rights to his minor children.  See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010).  Upon a
thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and
conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. 
Accordingly, we affirm[1]  the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J.,
THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.