State v. McKee

CourtListener 10154164ScctappAug 29, 2011

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Peter Leslie
McKee, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

J. Michelle Childs, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-409

Submitted August 15, 2011 – Filed August
29, 2011   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Daniel E. Johnson, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Peter McKee appeals his guilty plea, arguing the circuit court
erred in accepting his plea when the State failed to show he had defrauded
investors.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY,
JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.