State v. Maybin

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Lorenzo Maybin, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-293

Submitted May 1, 2011 – Filed June 14,
2011   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate
Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney
General Alan M. Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant
Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Acting Solicitor
Barry Barnette, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Lorenzo
Maybin appeals his convictions for breaking into a motor vehicle, petit larceny
and possession of drugs, arguing the trial court erred in failing to charge the
jury on mere presence.  Additionally, Maybin asserts numerous pro se
arguments.  After a thorough review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to
be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

FEW,
C.J., CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.