State v. Adcox

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jeffrey Stephen Adcox, Appellant.

Appeal From Pickens County

Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2011-UP-307

Submitted June 1, 2011 – Filed June 17,
2011

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, of Greenville, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Jeffrey Stephen Adcox pled guilty to armed robbery,
assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature, and false imprisonment. 
On appeal, he argues his guilty plea did not comply with the mandates set forth
in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969), and the solicitor engaged in
prosecutorial vindictiveness.  After a thorough
review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, KONDUROS, and
GEATHERS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.