CourtListener 10154084•State v. Allen
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Michael Anthony Allen, Appellant.
Appeal From Aiken County
R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-315
Submitted June 1, 2011 Filed June 21,
2011
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor J. Strom Thurmond, of Aiken, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Michael Anthony Allen appeals his convictions for armed
robbery, carjacking, and grand larceny, arguing his guilty plea did not comply
with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, WILLIAMS, and
THOMAS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.