State v. Johnson

CourtListener 10154077ScctappJun 22, 2011

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Calvin Jermaine
Johnson, Appellant.

Appeal From Anderson County

Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-318

Submitted June 1, 2011 – Filed June 22,
2011   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin
Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Calvin
Jermaine Johnson appeals his probation revocation, arguing the trial court
erred in refusing to consider the fact that the victim was contacting Johnson
and his family.  After a thorough
review of the record, counsel's brief, and Johnson's pro se brief, pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to
be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

FEW, C.J., PIEPER and
LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.