State v. Paquette

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent

v.

Jeffrey Paquette, Appellant.

Appeal From Orangeburg County

R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-237

Submitted May 1, 2011 – Filed May 24, 2011   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor David M. Pascoe, Jr., of Summerville,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Jeffrey
Paquette appeals his conviction for indecent exposure, arguing the trial court
erred in instructing the jury on reasonable doubt.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

SHORT, KONDUROS, and
GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.