State v. Richberg

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Shakene
Richberg, Appellant.

Appeal From Florence County

Ralph K. Anderson, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2011-UP-252 

Submitted May 1, 2011 – Filed May 24, 2011

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar L. Clements, III, of Florence,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Shakene Richberg appeals his convictions for failure
to stop for a blue light resulting in death and failure to stop for a blue
light resulting in great bodily injury, arguing the trial court erred in instructing
the jury on an inference without telling the jury it was free to reject the
inference.  After a thorough
review of the record, Richberg's pro se brief, and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to
be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

FEW, C.J., and
CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.