State v. Crout

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Raymond Buck
Crout, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

 L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2011-UP-027

Submitted January 1, 2011 – Filed January
25, 2011

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Raymond Buck Crout appeals his probation revocation.  Crout
argues the probation revocation court could not revoke his probation because he
had satisfied his original sentence when the Department of Corrections closed
his case for the community supervision program.  After a thorough review of the record, counsel's brief,
and Crout's pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we
dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's
petition to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

FEW,
C.J., SHORT and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.