In the Interest of Ronald S.

CourtListener 10153786ScctappJan 26, 2011

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT
SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS
PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

In the Interest
of Ronald S., a juvenile under the age of seventeen, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

 Anne Gue Jones, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-030

Submitted January 1, 2011 – Filed January
26, 2011

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John
W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of
Columbia; and Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Ronald S. appeals his commitment to the
Department of Juvenile Justice for an indeterminate time not to exceed his
twenty-first birthday for assault with the intent to kill.  Ronald argues the
family court erred in admitting testimony that violated his constitutional
right to confront the witnesses against him.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

THOMAS, PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.